Nathan Horton Montage and Reaction to Ovation: Game 6 in Boston



BU Exclusive: Alain Vigneault Makes Last-Minute Complaint to NHL Regarding Garden Glass

Bruins Heroes and Villains: Contrary to Popular Belief…

Rewind to game 2.

First Vancouver goal: Ference may have been outplayed here, and there was, as there always is, a touch of luck involved on the deflection that didn’t clear. He was in the right position to dump the puck in from the neutral zone and that seemed like a better decision than making a pass through 3 blue jerseys. Ference did not have a perfect game but the commotion regarding this play was severely overblown and reactionary.

Boston’s first goal: Lucic did very well what he once did well on a regular basis: He won a puck battle behind the net. This allowed Krejci to make a gorgeous play, and as Lucic stood his ground in front of the net (where he belongs), he was rewarded off the rebound as Alberts was occupied with Horton, who was probably perceived to be the bigger threat. Overtime winning goals aside, Horton has not been an effective 2-way player in this series, and needs someone to create room for him if he is going to be effective. He has, on many occasions, benefited from Lucic’s presence. This is not to take his past achievements away from him, but Horton is not a hero in this series.

Credit on Boston’s first goal is also due to Johnny Boychuk, who never misses the net from the point. Luongo’s well-known weakness is his lack of rebound control, so the Bruins have to take advantage of that fact and must use their accuracy from the point to create opportunities. For this reason and others, it would have been nice to see Chara’s slapshot on occasion.This is an already defensively weakened Vancouver team and it would serve the Bruins well to have them blocking 105pmh slapshots. So our first villain is Chara. He is simply not using his size to his advantage and he has seemed sluggish on occasion in these first 2 games. This isn’t just a perception that comes from comparing his skating with Vancouver’s speed, which isn’t legendary (especially not compared to Montreal and Tampa Bay).

Chara has been sluggish in part because he was given the impossible role of playing the punching bag in front of the net on the PP in game 1, in which he took a lot of abuse. he was also used against Vancouver’s first line and on the PK. No one defenseman can do all that and still skate with the best of them when it counts most. So perhaps ironically, on the errors that stood out most for Chara (particularly on the winning goal in game 2, on which he was outplayed), he is not the primary villain. If we absolutely must point fingers, this one falls on the coach, who overworked his #1 D. It is no surprise, then, that Chara no longer appears to be the Bruins’ top D-man. Having said that, credit is definitely due to Seidenberg, who has been a hero in every respect thus far in this series and in the last.

Boston powerplay goal: Contrary to popular velief, Seguin was actually very relevant to the success of this powerplay, though indirectly. Bieksa was largely taken out of the PK equation because he was too busy mirroring Seguin, which allowed Chara’s shot from the point to be defleced by Recchi, who often knows where to go when he’s in front of the net. Recchi had all the room in the world to move around and that is probably because because he was not perceived as the greatest offensive threat on the powerplay.

Recchi is definitely guilty of a handful of giveaways at even strength and he simply cannot keep up with the speed of the game but if he can manage to stay in front of the net, his presence on the powerplay is not the liability that it is 5-on-5. We might even classify him as the hero on the PP, provided that there are 3 forwards on the ice. The 3D lineup was an epic failure on the part of Claude Julien, who needs to think offense because the purpose of the powerplay is to score. The villain in the attacking zone, then, is the coach. This is less a criticism of Julien as it is a matter of letting his players off the hook for decisions from the coaching staff that have been les than ideal.

Props to Brad Marcahnd, who was incredibly effective on the PK despite the Vancouver PP goal. The bench was yelling at him to break away with tht puck on the first Vancouver PP, and he came quite close to a breakaway. His ability to maneuver around the D and create plays has increased 10-fold since the first round of these playoffs and he is going to be a great player. With any luck, his ability will pay off for the Bruins in game 3.

Vancouver’s second tying goal: This one was tragic because Lucic finally won a battle along the boards and cleared the puck to an open Chara, who could not seem to get his stick within even 2 feet of the puck. No other errors were made leading up to the goal. Seidenberg could not easily have obtaied possession on the redirected puck. Villan? At first glance, it’s Chara. Is your car responsible if it stalls because you’ve failed to change the oil? Not really. Similarly, Chara is looking tired, and that speaks volumes about the manner in which he has been used. Chara isn’t just big, he is probably in better shape than anyone else in the league. But he has quite literally been played in every scenario and is, at bottom, a human being. Julien must reserve the use of Chara for moments when it counts most, and only for those moments. He must be used to shut down the first line, and only to shut down the first line–this despite the fact that he is a great decision-maker on the PK and PP, when he’s at his best.

Johnny Boychuk and Andrew Ference, while excellent in many areas, are not suddenly going to become better than they are. They are going to turn the puck over at times. That’s just something that Bruins fans are going to have to come to terms with. This team is as good as it is and not better, and it was good enough to win at least one of the first 2 games in this series in Vancouver. But it did not. Part of the blame for that falls on the coaching staff, and the rest falls on Vancouver’s ability to attack. We have to accept that fact. The coaching staff isn’t perfect and this tam has come this far on the basis of heart, and not talent. Take pride in that fact if you’re a Bruins fan. The Bruins don’t have a Stamkos but they have guys who are willing to sacrifice their bodies for the puck. This goes a long way and brings us to the final point.

Michael Ryder and Tyler Seguin will not hold on to the puck if it means being hit. Call it a conscious decision or call it instinct, but this this is the team we have to work with and these are the facts. The good news is that these 2 forwards have murderous offensive ability and must be played alongside players who are capable of creating space. Seguin could not have done in this series what he did in his first 2 playoff games because his opponents now know he’s a threat and they’ve therefore been able to do a good job at shutting him down. Pair him with someone who will take out the D and he’ll sink 2 goals per game for this team. Natural goal scorers are rare and the Bruins are very lucky to have him. He doesn’t need a good passer who is also afraid of taking the body; he needs the physical play of his teammates. So coaching is a key factor in Seguin’s performance. He needs more than 6 or 7 minutes of ice time.

Here’s to hoping that the Boston Bruins carry out justice for Patrice Bergeron tonight. As a human being and elite player who is respected all over the league, this team cannot allow him or the game of hockey to be ridiculed in the way it has been throughout this series. They must use their size and strength to set boundaries for a disrespectful Vancouver team. This will bring the momentum they need to once again play with confidence, which is probably the single-most crucial element missing thus far in this series.

The Boston Bruins: A Code of Integrity

For many of us, it is clear that our Boston Bruins embody integrity. Throughout the regular season, instead of hearing rumors about extracurricular drunken player excursions or domestic abuse charges, we are bombarded with charity events. Our Boston Bruins have a captain who has climbed Mount Kilimanjero; Andrew Ference and Zdeno Chara are also involved in Right to Play, whose mission is to improve the lives of children in some of the most disadvantaged areas of the world “by using the power of sport and play for development, health and peace.” (Source)

The Boston Bruins certainly make mistakes, like any group of mortals, and nothing is more indicative of this fact than the now infamous green finger event involving Andrew Ference. When he shows us his middle finger, however, we’re shocked exactly because such behavior is uncharacteristic our Boston Bruins. The last time we drafted a rat like Brad Marchand, for instance, it was two and a half decades ago. But even Marchy is loved because although he’s a regular disturber, he doesn’t stoop to Averian antics or resort to feminine antics involving his teeth.

Marc Savard was also involved in a biting incident, as we know, and although there was speculation as to whether Carcillo was tugging on Savard’s front teeth, no one thought this was acceptable behavior, if it did indeed take place. But let’s not shame the memory of one of the best centers ever to wear a Bruins jersey. Marc Savard, who stands 5’9″, was always the first to jump to the defense of his teammates and wasn’t afraid to stir it up. He was also not the kind of player to stoop to the level of cheap-shotting highly respected players with the moral character of someone like Patrice Bergeron. The same cannot be said of players like Alex Burrows, who had, admittedly, toned it down this past regular season.

Had the cowardly Burrows even transpired with some other player, like Brad Marchand or Milan Lucic, there would likely not have been much commotion regarding the incident. But the outrage wasn’t primarily about his non-suspension, even though Jarkko Ruutu was suspended 2 games for the exact same act. The outrage wasn’t over the scrum, either. It was over the fact that the well-respected Bergeron entered the scrum merely to push aside the instigating 3rd man in. There was no observable hostility of cheap-shotting on his part.

Scrums are part of the game, and sometimes, so are cheap shots. Yet you won’t find Lucic sucker-punching a player like Kevin Bieksa or conveniently falling over rival Carey Price with intent to injure–you can take that promise to the bank. With the aggression of the Boston Bruins comes a code of conduct centered on honor and respect.

Emotions can get the better of you in intense contexts. The Boston Bruins, despite their undeserved reputation, are rumored in some circles to be ‘dirty’. Nothing could be further from the truth. As a Boston Bruins fan, we are often taken aback by teams like the Philadephia Flyers and the Montreal Canadiens for this very reason–we forget that not everyone follows the same code.

The code of integrity in question was highlighted by Kevin Bieksa himself last month, when he argued that his team had crossed a line that put into jeopardy the integrity of the game of hockey itself:

“I know guys will do whatever it takes for a power play to win a game,” Bieksa said. “But sometimes they’re crossing that line of integrity. I think for the better of the game, for the good of the game we need people to stay on that line and not cross it, and not dive and exaggerate for calls.” (Source)

Our Boston Bruins are not merely playing for the Stanley Cup in this final round; they are playing for each other. This is what they do. Their last game with the Tampa Bay Lightning was one of the most intense and hard-hitting hockey games many of us had ever witnessed, and not one penalty call was made. To the admission of both coaches, this was not due to officiating leniency but to the fact that both teams respected the boundaries of physical play.

There is a place for hard-hitting hockey, and many of us want to keep it that way. There is also a place for fighting, and many of us very much want it to stay that way. There is no place, however, in a Stanley Cup final for hits aimed at the termination of budding careers or feminine antics of the kind that will be permanently recorded in the history books. If the Boston Bruins lose this series, they will do so with integrity. If they get their name on the Stanley Cup, it will be for their ability to play hockey.

Win or lose, as the world watches these two teams battle it out for the greatest prize of all, one great result that will come out of this Stanley Cup final is that the world will be able to judge for themselves the character of this Boston Bruins team. This is a we can be proud of. This is a team we’re already proud of.


Bruins You Be Killin’ Em – 2011 Boston Bruins – Moises ft. Oliveira

%d bloggers like this: